This one’s actually even book-related… There’s a not-so-stellar-review of The Tea House at GUD Magazine–though rather interestingly they give the book three out of five stars on their goodreads. I guess the reviewer in this case hated everything we really liked. Oh well, win some, lose some.
(And yes, bad reviews are good when they’re very specific about what the reader didn’t like. Like that review of Quid Pro Quo the other day, where the reviewer was very specific about not caring for plot but wanting porn–rather excellent review. Anybody who likes plot is sure to want to read it now, right? Same difference here.)